Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Diarra v. Dekalb County Sheriff et al
as 1:2021cv03895
Petitioner:
Moussa Diarra
Respondent:
DeKalb County Sheriff, Dekalb County Jail, Governor of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. Commissioner of Georgia Dept. of Correction (GDC) / Board of GA et al
as 1:2019cv04290
Defendant:
Warden, Deputy Warden of Care and Treatment, Deputy Warden of Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Mareio Antonio Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Heap et al
as 4:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Judge Michael Karpf, Governor Brian Kemp, Attorney Michael Schiavone and others
Plaintiff:
Jabbar Muhammad Ali Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Washington v. Governor of Georgia
as 1:2019mi00003
Plaintiff:
Matthew Washington
Defendant:
Governor of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Harpo v. Craig et al
as 1:2016cv03965
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Daniel J. Craig, Richmond County District Attorney, State Bar of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Thrash et al
as 1:2012cv00184
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester
Respondent:
T. W. Thrash, J. F. King, B. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Governor of Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv03941
Plaintiff:
Patricia W. Walker
Defendant:
Governor of Georgia, State of Georgia and Former Governor of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena v. Governor of Georgia's Capitol
as 4:2008cv00096
Plaintiff:
Manuel Raul Reyes Pena
Defendant:
Governor of Georgia's Capitol
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00037
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Cobble v. Governor of Georgia
as 1:2007cv00516
Plaintiff:
David Cobble
Defendant:
Governor of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
