Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racanelli v. Pritizker et al
as 4:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
J B Pritizker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Bogle et al
as 1:2023cv03682
Plaintiff:
Mickey Russell
Defendant:
Michelle Bogle, Kris Bogle, Hasina Javed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kugler v. Donathan et al
as 4:2022cv04138
Plaintiff:
Devin Kugler
Defendant:
Gregory Donathan, Erin Posey, William Epperson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Hou et al
as 1:2022cv02224
Petitioner:
Frankie N. Walker
Respondent:
Grace B Hou, Greg Scott and Josh Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkisson et al v. Eagleson et al
as 1:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
John Adkisson, Sylvia Collins, Terry Price and others
Defendant:
Theresa A. Eagleson and Grace B Hou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Brokaw v. Fields et al
as 3:2021cv01149
Plaintiff:
Benjamin John Brokaw
Defendant:
Rex Fields, Dr. Sobut, Lily Alex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brokaw v. IL Dept of Human Services et al
as 3:2021cv00801
Plaintiff:
Benjamin John Brokaw
Defendant:
IL Dept of Human Services, Chester Mental Health Center, Grace B Hou and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrington v. Hou et al
as 4:2021cv04079
Defendant:
Grace B Hou, Greg Donathan and J B Pritzker
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
