Cases 11 - 20 of 273
Raymond Watison v. Grady Perry, et al
as 23-5059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND WATISON, also known as King Belal
Defendant / Appellee:
GRADY PERRY, Warden, ASSOCIATE WARDEN SIDNEY CARTER, LARRY COLEMAN, Assistant Chief of Security and others
Massey v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Kayla Massey
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Dameon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Hearing v. Grady Perry
as 23-5019
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE HEARING
Respondent / Appellee:
GRADY PERRY, Warden
David Hearing v. Grady Perry
as 23-5020
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE HEARING
Respondent / Appellee:
GRADY PERRY, Warden
Williams v. Perry
as 3:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Verchaunt J. Williams
Respondent:
Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinzell GrastyIn re: Quinzell Grasty
as 22-5960
Petitioner:
In re: QUINZELL LA'WON GRASTY
Respondent:
GRADY PERRY
Raymond Watison v. Core Civic Solutions, et al
as 22-5804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND WATISON
Defendant:
CORE CIVIC SOLUTIONS
Defendant / Appellee:
GRADY PERRY, Warden, DARYL CREWS, Chief of Security, LARRY COLEMAN, Assistant Chief of Security and others
Ultimate Cakra Liberation, et al v. Trinity Services Group, Inc., et al
as 22-5789
Plaintiff:
ULTIMATE CAKRA LIBERATION, Tribunal
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES ORLANDO FIELDS, Noble:buddha-angavu:sishya and CHARLES ORLANDO FIELDS, aka Noble:buddha-angavu:sishya
Defendant / Appellee:
TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, INC., TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, TROUSDALE TURNER CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Fredrick TuckerIn re: Fredrick Tucker
as 22-5785
Petitioner:
In re: FREDRICK LEON TUCKER
Respondent:
GRADY PERRY, Warden
Jeffrey Henry v. Grady Perry
as 22-5777
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY L. HENRY
Respondent / Appellee:
GRADY PERRY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
