Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Berry III v. Ashcroft et al
as 4:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Paul Berry III
Defendant:
John R. Ashcroft and State of Missouri
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Joseph Pereles, Matthew Bax, Ike Graham and others
Interpleader:
Derrick Good
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Central Trust Co. et al v. Allen et al
as 4:2021cv01206
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Allen
Defendant:
Central Trust Company, David Allen, Thomas Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hershey v. The Curators of the University of Missouri et al
as 2:2020cv04239
Defendant:
Nancy Monteer, Dr. Alexander Cartwright, David L. Steelman and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Hershey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clay et al v. Sunflower Development Group et al
as 4:2017cv00927
Defendant:
Sunflower Development Group, LLC , Brian Anderson , Jewel Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Abram Clay and Courtney Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. University City, Missouri
as 4:2017cv02263
Plaintiff:
Clarence J. Graham
Defendant:
University City, Missouri and Larry Becton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
