Cases 41 - 50 of 126
Brown v. Graham et al
as 3:2018cv00389
Plaintiff:
Milton Brown
Defendant:
Torrey Graham and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00017
Defendant:
Infowars, LLC, Lee Stranahan, Scott Creighton and others
Plaintiff:
Brennan M. Gilmore
Amicus Curiae:
Veronique de la Rosa, Neil Heslin, Civil Procedure Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Alfred S Thomas, Jr., City of Charlottesville, Attorney Joseph D. Platania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Midyette v. Henrico County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Graham Gilbert Midyette
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Correct Care Systems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins et al v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2017cv01455
Plaintiff:
Eddie Higgins , David Lupo , Susan Lupo and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Audi Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. USA
as 3:2017cv00771
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blakey v. Herring et al
as 3:2017cv00468
Plaintiff:
William Thornton Blakey
Defendant:
Mark Herring, Susan Barr, Richard E. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. VBJO, VBCC.GTZ
as 1:2017cv00275
Plaintiff:
Markeese J. Graham
Defendant:
VBJO, VBCC.GTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. VitalSpring Technologies, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
Michael Graham
Defendant:
VitalSpring Technologies, Inc, Yona Health Systems, LLC and Spreedhar Potarazu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Norman v. Graham
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Norman
Defendant:
Rachelle Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
