Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Schwartzle Construction, LLC v. Granite Re, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv04060
Plaintiff: Schwartzle Construction, LLC
Defendant: Granite Re, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Falcon Drilling & Blasting, Inc. v. Kimball Excavating, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv00237
Plaintiff: Falcon Drilling & Blasting, Inc., Falcon Drilling & Blasting, Inc. and United States of America
Defendant: Kimball Excavating, Inc., Granite Re, Inc. and Granite Re, Inc.
Granite Re, Inc. v. La Crescent, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2008cv00441
Plaintiff: Granite Re, Inc. and Granite Re, Inc.
Defendant: La Crescent, City of, MinnComm Utility Construction Co, Daniel J Weidner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Granite Re Inc et al v. Gustafson et al
as 4:2008cv00013
Plaintiff: Granite Re Inc, Pate Bonding, Inc., Jonathan Pate and others
Defendant: Darrel Gustafson and Turtle Mountain Tribal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Type: Contract Insurance
Minnesota Brick and Tile Company v. Norcon Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv01458
Plaintiff: Minnesota Brick and Tile Company
Defendant: Norcon Corporation, Norcon Corporation and Granite Re, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Norcon Corporation
Counter Defendant: Minnesota Brick and Tile Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Dennis Larson v. Granite Re We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1188
Plaintiff - Appellee: Dennis Larson, a Minnesota resident
Defendant - Appellant: Granite Re, Inc.
Dennis Larson v. Granite Re Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1186
Plaintiff - Appellant: Dennis Larson, a Minnesota resident
Defendant - Appellee: Granite Re, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?