Other Statutory Actions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 395
Monday v. Grant Construction & Roofing, Inc.
as 8:2023cv02992
Plaintiff: Jill Monday
Defendant: Grant Construction & Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dela Cruz v. Grant et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv09614
Plaintiff: Maria Cristina N Dela Cruz
Defendant: Stephen Joseph Grant and Wendy Allen Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
McClenny Moseley v. Equal Access
as 23-30692
Respondent / Appellee: McClenny Moseley & Associates, P.L.L.C., Cameron S. Snowden, James M. McClenny and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Equal Access Justice Fund, L.P. and EAJF ESQ Fund, L.P.
Grant et al v. Health Screening Services, LLC et al
as 0:2023mc61300
Plaintiff: Christopher P Grant and Tymekah Danielle Ferguson
Defendant: Health Screening Services, LLC, Nick Turner, Labsolutions, LLC and others
Kone et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2023cv05790
Lead Plaintiff: Mama Kone
Plaintiff: Celestine Kone, Lacina Kone, Stephen Ciccone and others
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Knoll v. Water Resources Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00928
Petitioner: Grant Knoll
Respondent: Water Resources Commission and Water Resources Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Knoll v. Water Resources Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00929
Petitioner: Grant Knoll
Respondent: Water Resources Commission and Water Resources Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Grant v Wells Frgo, et al
as 3:2023cv00576
Plaintiff: Gary Grant
Defendant: Wells Frgo, Tim Sian, Charles W. Scharf and others
Kevin Cassaday v. Dow Chemical Company, et al
as 23-1394
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN WILLIAM CASSADAY
Defendant / Appellee: DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, ANDREW N. LIVERIS, CEO, ROBERT STEELMAN and others
APPLICATION OF LAE TECHNOLOGIES HONG KONG LIMITED FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING
as 3:2023cv02314
In Re: APPLICATION OF LAE TECHNOLOGIES HONG KONG LIMITED FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?