Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Spencer v. Culliver et al
as 2:2009cv01270
Petitioner:
Phillip Spencer
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McConico v. Culliver et al
as 1:2009cv00322
Petitioner:
James McConico, Jr.
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver, Troy King and Richard Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russo v. Culliver
as 2:2009cv00967
Petitioner:
Victor Joseph Russo
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McConico v. Culliver et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2009cv00428
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Troy King and Richard Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perkins v. Culliver et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
James Perkins
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Andrews v. Culliver et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2008cv00540
Plaintiff:
LLoyd Andrews
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Culliver et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2008cv00540
Plaintiff:
LLoyd Andrews
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Griggs v. Culliver
as 1:2008cv00320
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Griggs
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McConico v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2008cv00415
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Troy King and Grantt Culliver
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reese v. Culliver et al
as 2:2008cv00697
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Reese
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
