Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Guy v. Dunn et al
as 4:2021cv00264
Defendant:
Tanya Ary, Antoine Price, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Guy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Correctional Officer Cunningham, Kenneth Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Ladarius Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lang et al
as 1:2018cv00349
Defendant:
Nurse Taylor, K. Lang, Nurse Wall and others
Plaintiff:
Jon L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Santangelo Vincent
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grantt Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griggs v. Dunn et al
as 1:2016cv00626
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Griggs
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Grantt Culliver, Cynthia Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard Jemison, Jr. v. Grantt Culliver, et al
as 13-11084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD JEMISON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GRANTT CULLIVER, CARTER DAVENPORT, PATRICE RICHIE and others
Billy Williams v. Ferrell, et al
as 11-11901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
FERRELL and GRANTT CULLIVER
Bey v. Allen et al
as 4:2009cv02425
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Wright Bey, Sr
Defendant:
Richard Allen, James DeLoach, Gwendolyn Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Culliver et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00817
Plaintiff:
Jason Wesley Chapman
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Holman Correctional Facility and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Culliver et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
Wallace Rivers
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
