Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Treva Thompson, et al v. Secretary of State, et al
as 21-10034
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIUS GAMBLE, TREVA THOMPSON, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated, TIMOTHY LANIER, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES SNIPES, III, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Montgomery County Board of Registrars and on behalf of a class of all voter registrars in the State of Alabama, LEIGH GWATHNEY, in her official capacity as Chairman of the Board of Pardons and Paroles and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA
People First of Alabama, et al v. Secretary of State, et al
as 20-14066
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE ANDERSON-SMITH, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, ALLEEN BARNETT, In her official capacity as Absentee Election Manager of Mobile County, Alabama and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERYL THREADGILL-MATTHEWS, PEOPLE FIRST OF ALABAMA, HOWARD PORTER, JR. and others
People First of Alabama, et al v. Secretary of State, et al
as 20-13695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BLACK VOTERS MATTER CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE, GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, HOWARD PORTER, JR. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellant:
DON DAVIS, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Adelante Alabama Worker Center et al v. Department Of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2017cv09557
Plaintiff:
Adelante Alabama Worker Center , Detention Watch Network , Greater Birmingham Ministries and others
Defendant:
Department Of Homeland Security and Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Marnika Lewis, et al v. Governor of Alabama, et al
as 17-11009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARNIKA LEWIS, ANTOIN ADAMS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, in his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Alabama, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
County of Santa Clara v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 3:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Dana J. Boente, Mark Sandy and others
Amicus Curiae:
LifeMoves, City of Salinas, Administrative Law Professors and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Young Women's Christian Association of Silicon Valley
Intervenor Defendant:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES et al v. STATE OF ALABAMA et al
as 1:2016mc02506
Plaintiff:
GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, ALABAMA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC., GIOV ANA AMBROSIO and others
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, ROBERT J. BENTLEY, LUTHER J. STRANGE and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Lewis et al v. Bentley et al
as 2:2016cv00690
Plaintiff:
Marnika Lewis , Antoin Adams , National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and others
Defendant:
Robert J. Bentley and Luther J Strange, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hispanic Interest Coalition of, et al v. Governor of Alabama, et al
as 11-14535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HISPANIC INTEREST COALITION OF ALABAMA, AIDS ACTION COALITION, HUNTSVILLE INTERNATIONAL HELP CENTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, ALABAMA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION and others
:
SERVICE
Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama et al v. Bentley et al
as 5:2011cv02484
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Luther Strange , Joseph B. Morton and others
Plaintiff:
Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama , Aids Action Coalition , Huntsville International Help Center and others
Movant:
United States of America
Amicu:
LULAC , META, Inc. , Hispanic College Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
