Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mays v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv12705
Plaintiff:
Eric B. Mays
Defendant:
Ladel Lewis, Eva Worthing, Chief Terence Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Green v. Doctors Urgent Care Group PC
as 2:2023cv11773
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Green
Defendant:
Doctors Urgent Care Group PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
English v. Kalamazoo Public Schools et al
as 1:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
James English
Defendant:
Kalamazoo Public Schools, Kalamazoo Public Schools Board of Education, Patti Sholler-Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights: Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv11005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Harris et al v. Wayne et al
as 2:2023cv10986
Plaintiff:
Nicole Harris, Blanca Arguelles, Amber Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Officer Terri Graham and Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith #267009 v. Maloney et al
as 1:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Derrick Lee Smith #267009
Defendant:
Paul L. Maloney, Gordon J. Quist, Hala Y. Jarbou and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Village Green of Rochester v. McAllister
as 2:2023cv10587
Plaintiff:
Village Green of Rochester
Defendant:
Dana McAllister
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
