Cases 11 - 20 of 66
DeVillion v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2013cv02134
Plaintiff:
Kevin John DeVillion
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the et al
as 0:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman and others
Latimer v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv00872
Petitioner:
Mark Latimer
Respondent:
Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Greg Carlson and others
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, the et al
as 0:2012cv02990
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, the, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Corrections Medical Services and others
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, the et al
as 0:2012cv01554
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, the, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Jesson et al
as 0:2012cv01410
Plaintiff:
Michael Pittman
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folson v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv01137
Plaintiff:
Al Folson
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eberhardt v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00942
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bruce Eberhardt
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Parsons, Jr.
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00550
Plaintiff:
Terry Ray Jackson
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
