Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Webb v. Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute
as 3:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Republican Party of Cumberland County TN
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Republican Party of Cumberland County TN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. First Realty et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
First Realty, Howard Glen McDonald, Robert Grimsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Powers, et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Deputy (f/n/u) Powers, Deputy Levi Gilliam, Judge William Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Webb et al
as 2:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Lewana Castillo Webb, John Tyler Merchant, Avery York, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Tracking System
as 2:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Tracking System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Mayberry
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Ivy Gardner Mayberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Cox
as 2:2023cv00020
Petitioner:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Respondent:
Sheriff Casey Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Dunaway et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Bryant Dunaway, Craig Fickling, Cumberland County, TN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Fickling et al
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Craig Frickeling, Casey Cox, 13th District DA's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
