Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DANIELS v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
as 2:2020cv00858
Defendant: GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Plaintiff: JASON DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMMONS v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00238
Defendant: FIRSTGROUP AMERICA and GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Plaintiff: ERIN SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC
as 2:2017cv01018
Plaintiff: CLYDETTA SMITH
Defendant: GREYHOUND LINES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNEDY v. GREYHOUND LINES INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00387
Plaintiff: NYDIA KENNEDY
Defendant: GREYHOUND LINES INC. , LINDSAY THOMPKINS and MONIQUE WYNN
Thirdparty_defendant: CHANDRA SANYASI
Thirdparty_plaintiff: MONIQUE WYNN , GREYHOUND LINES INC. and LINDSAY THOMPKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AKORLI v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
as 2:2014cv00046
Plaintiff: STEFAN T. AKORLI
Defendant: GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RICHES v. AMTRAK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01378
Plaintiff: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant: AMTRAK, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., GREYHOUND LINES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00456
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00223
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01411
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00412
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?