Cases 11 - 20 of 160
James B. Jordan v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02406
Plaintiff:
James B. Jordan
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Hawk v. Flix North America, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
Flix North America, Inc and Greyhound Lines, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon Johnson, et al
as 22-56152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYBON C. JOHNSON, Warden, CSPA LA COUNTY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cedric Greene, Jr. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 22-16773
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CEDRIC GREENE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Bazabal et al v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01520
Plaintiff:
Juan Bazabal and Keinard Simpson
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv07216
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dunigan v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Catanghal v. Greyhound Lines Inc
as 1:2022cv00961
Plaintiff:
Gerald De Leon Catanghal
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55409
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Geovanni Moreno v. Valley Transit Company
as 2:2021cv08321
Plaintiff:
Geovanni Moreno
Defendant:
Valley Transit Company, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
