Cases 31 - 40 of 237
Johnson v. Berg et al
as 1:2021cv03181
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Berg, Gomez, Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robledo-Valdez v. Hansen et al
as 1:2021cv03014
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Robledo-Valdez and C. S. Robledo
Defendant:
Warden Terry Jaques, Travis Marler, carolyn hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Burtlow et al
as 1:2021cv02714
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Eugene Owens
Defendant:
Siobhan Burtlow, Joshua Lessar, Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03204
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader and Craig James Strader
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sam A. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scarver v. Williams
as 1:2021cv02149
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Scarver
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Anthony A. DeCesaro, Marshall Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. Elder et al
as 1:2021cv01756
Defendant:
Cy Gillespie and Bill Elder
Plaintiff:
Darlene Griffith
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER/ INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Darlene Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montanez v. Caley et al
as 1:2021cv01714
Petitioner:
Sixto Montanez
Defendant:
Eddie Caley, Kristy Stansell, A. Dugger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pfundstein v. Home Depot USA et al
as 2:2021cv00340
Defendant:
Kenyon Kawa, J. Griffith, Ernest Robert Russo, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael John Pfundstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. Hamilton et al
as 1:2021cv01349
Defendant:
Rick Hamilton, High Country Roofing and Rick Hampton
Plaintiff:
Darlene Griffith
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER/ INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Darlene Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaves v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv01269
Defendant:
Marshall Griffith, Gypsy Kelso, Jerry Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
