Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Kobata et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25368
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Kobata , Ingeborg Sautter , Emma Smith and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Persinger v. Northern Regional Jail & Correctional Facility
as 5:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Persinger, Jr.
Defendant:
Northern Regional Jail & Correctional Facility, Dale Griffith, James Rubenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv23990
Plaintiff:
Mary Juanita Griffith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv23928
Plaintiff:
Valerie Kaye Griffith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv22625
Plaintiff:
Tina Griffith
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22568
Plaintiff:
Tricia Griffith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20972
Plaintiff:
Andrea Griffith and Floyd Wayne Griffith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv19191
Plaintiff:
Carrie Griffith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv18629
Plaintiff:
Susie P. Griffith and Dave J. Griffith, Sr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv18411
Plaintiff:
Patricia Griffith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
