Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Rosenblatt v. iPass Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02004
Defendant:
Justin R. Spencer, Neal I. Goldman, Michael J. Tedesco and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Leor v. Gil et al
as 1:2015cv00732
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Reuven Leor
Defendant:
Satinder Gil, Andrew Reamer, Renny Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman v. Davis et al
as 1:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jonath K Chapman, Sr
Defendant:
Eric Davis, Krista Griffith, C.d. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Board of Trustees, Roofers Local No. 30 Combined Welfare Fund et al v. D.W. Griffith Inc.
as 1:2012mc00236
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees, Roofers Local No. 30 Combined Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees, Roofers Local No. 30 Combined Pension Fund, Board of Trustees, Roofers Local No. 30 Combined Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
D.W. Griffith Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00359
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Kostyshyn v. MHM Services et al
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
MHM Services, Ben Griffiths, Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kostyshyn v. Pedrick et al
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Allen Pedrick, John W. Polk, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Mechanick et al
as 1:2011cv00038
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Stephen Mechanick , Steve Eichel, Leo Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Mechanick et al
as 1:2010cv01118
Plaintiff:
Joe F. Cooper
Defendant:
Stephen Mechanick, Steve Eichel, Leo Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurst v. Benton Counselman et al
as 1:2010cv00899
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Hurst
Defendant:
Benton Counselman, Jeffrey Horvath, Steven Getek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
