Cases 1 - 10 of 193
v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01166
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, YVONNE RUIZ, OFFICER JOSEPH WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOMACK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WOMACK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, YVONNE RUIZ, JOSEPH WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bowman v. Mosely et al
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowman
Defendant:
Detective Marlena Mosely, City of Philadelphia, Detective Dennis Dusack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
LORCH v. GROSS
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
RONALD LORCH and KAREN LORCH
Defendant:
STEVEN I. GROSS and GENEVIEVE GROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
GROSS et al v. THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv05077
Plaintiff:
G.S. PETER GROSS, D.O. and G.S. PETER GROSS, D.O., P.C.
Defendant:
THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE COMPANY, FRED DIMEO and NANCY DIMEO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Gross v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv02088
Petitioner:
Donald Gross
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rankin v. Shapiro et al.
as 1:2023cv01859
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robert Rankin
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro, Xavior Becerra, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
RIVERA v. GROSS
as 5:2023cv02488
Plaintiff:
ANA M. RIVERA
Defendant:
ABIGAIL A. GROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
