Cases 21 - 25 of 25
Uretek USA, Inc. et al v. Certified Foundations, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv01909
Plaintiff:
Uretek USA, Inc. , Benefil Worldwide Oy and Uretek ICR, LLC
Defendant:
Certified Foundations, Inc. and LRE Ground Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Diversified in Ground Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv01709
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund, Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund, Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers and others
Defendant:
Diversified in Ground Services, Inc. and Robert J. Vorderbruggen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type:
Labor
Massey et al v. Diversified in Ground Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv01119
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Massey, James Mortenson, Arland B. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Diversified in Ground Services, Inc. and Robert J. Vorderbruggen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Type:
Labor
Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers et al v. Diversified Ground Services, Inc.
as 0:2008cv05865
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers and Local #49 International Union Of Operating Engineers and Associated General Contractors of Minnesota Apprenticeship and Training Program and their Trustees
Defendant:
Diversified Ground Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
