Cases 1 - 10 of 52
(PS) Al-Zaghari et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Eva D. Al-Zaghari and Shirley V. Remmert
Defendant:
State of California, Gavin Newsom, Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Remmert et al v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Shirley V. Remmert and Eva Al-Zaghari
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, John Grandsaert, San Mateo County Public Guardian's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Guest v. Juul Labs Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv09111
Defendant:
McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kellen Guest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinsale Insurance Company v. Golden Beginnings, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv10302
Defendant:
Monica Austin, Telitha McGee, Dawn McGee Routt and others
Plaintiff:
Kinsale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd. v. Nomadix, Inc.
as 8:2020mc00020
Plaintiff:
Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd.
Petitioner:
William H. Shreve
Defendant:
Nomadix, Inc.
Guest v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01178
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Gayle Janeen Guest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Guest v. Monsanto Company Corporation
as 3:2020cv04214
Defendant:
Monsanto Company Corporation
Plaintiff:
Frisco Decarlos Guest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nomadix, Inc. v. Guest-Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd.
as 2:2019cv04980
Defendant:
Guest-Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Nomadix, Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Michael D. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
