Cases 1 - 10 of 71
State of Maryland v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00459
Defendant:
Cumberland Farms, Inc., Shell Oil Products Company LLC, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
State of Maryland
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
GULF OIL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. RAJ & MAMTA REALTY LLC et al
as 2:2023cv20510
Plaintiff:
GULF OIL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
RAJ & MAMTA REALTY LLC, RAJ KUMAR and MAMTA KUMAR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
7-Eleven, Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05746
Petitioner:
The Gymboree Corporation, The Children's Place Retail Stores, Inc., Thornton's Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marathon Petroleum Company LP, Priceline.com, LLC, National RailRoad Passenger Corporation and others
Respondent:
Mastercard Incorporated, Wells Fargo & Company, Citigroup Inc and others
Interested Party:
Cardtronics USA, Inc. and John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)
Material Witne:
Verifone, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Transform SR Holdings LLC and Elgin Ave. Recovery, LLC
Defendant:
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)
Special Master:
James Orenstein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Gulf Oil Limited Partnership v. West Gas Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07436
Plaintiff:
Gulf Oil Limited Partnership
Defendant:
West Gas Inc. and Manoj Kumar
GULF OIL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. 61 SPRUCE STREET HOLDING CORP. et al
as 2:2023cv03915
Plaintiff:
GULF OIL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
61 SPRUCE STREET HOLDING CORP. and PASQUALE DEANGELIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2008cv00312
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Commisisoner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Administrator of the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund and others
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp., Rosemore Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Harbans Singh, Gurmail Singh and John and Jane Does Nos. 1-100
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
H.P. Delta, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Robert Melecci and Dhandi Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Village of Bethalto v. Ashland, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv08182
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America, Inc., Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Village of Bethalto
Intervenor Plaintiff:
City of Nokomis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
City of Lowell Massachusetts v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2005cv04018
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corp, doing business as Exxon Mobile Refining and Supply Company doing business as Exxon Chemical USA doing business as ExxonMobil Chemical Corporation formerly known as Exxon Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Company individually also known as Arco formerly known as Arco Petroleum Company doing business as Arco Products Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. individually formerly known as Gulf Oil Corporation doing business as Chevron Products Company doing business as Chevron Chemical Company and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
City of Lowell Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Coraopolis Water And Sewer Authority v. Ashland, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07874
Plaintiff:
Coraopolis Water and Sewer Authority
Cross Defendant:
Ashland, Inc., Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), Sunoco, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Chevron Corporation, Coastal Oil New England, ConocoPhillips Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Kouts Town of v. Ashland Inc et al
as 1:2010cv08184
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America Inc, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kouts Town of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
