Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Edmond v. Thaler et al
as 3:2010cv01381
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Edmond
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID, Erwin, Guy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Remigio Martinez, III v. Villalobos, et al
as 10-10604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REMIGIO ARCINIEGA MARTINEZ, III
Defendant - Appellee:
VILLALOBOS, Officer, JOSEPH MEEGAN, Physician's Assistant, SHANE MARTINEZ, Medical Complaints Coordinator and others
Joe Acosta, III v. Pople, et al
as 10-50487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ANGEL ACOSTA, III
Defendant - Appellee:
POPLE, Officer, Security Threat Group Investigator, CHANEY, Senior Warden, FOX, Major and others
Carlos Criollo v. Paulette Milton, et al
as 10-40346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS CRIOLLO
Defendant - Appellee:
PAULETTE F. MILTON, PAM MOORE-PACE, GUY SMITH and others
Gabriel Smith v. Texas Tech University, et al
as 10-10248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIELLE M SMITH, also known as Gabriel Marquette Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, S REILLY, TIMOTHY REVELL and others
Robert Tuft v. State of Texas, et al
as 10-20135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A TUFT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, VERNON PITTMAN, Warden-Jester 3, JEROLD BRAGGS, Assistant Warden, Jester 3 and others
Acosta v. Pople et al
as 5:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Acosta, III
Defendant:
Mrs. Aguero, V. Barrow, Grand Seargent Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noblitt v. Sims et al
as 1:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Richard Noblitt
Defendant:
Ora G Sims, Mark Richards, Shaw Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stennett v. Dominguez et al
as 6:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Guyton Stennett
Defendant:
Dominguez, Gore, Owen J. Murray D.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta v. Officer Pople et al
as 4:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Acosta, III
Defendant:
Officer Pople, Chaney, Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
