Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
McDonald et al v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv02476
Plaintiff:
Terrill McDonald and Mariel Baez
Defendant:
H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. and H&M Fashion USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Rachel Adin LLC v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
as 1:2023cv11167
Plaintiff:
Rachel Adin LLC New York limited liability company doing business as OX and Rachel Adin LLC doing business as OX
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sally v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
as 4:2023cv01451
Plaintiff:
Randall Sally
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jones v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz et al
as 1:2023cv04778
Plaintiff:
Loretta Jones
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz, U.S. Supreme Court, International Criminal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ventura v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
as 1:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
Victoria Ventura
Defendant:
H & M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lizama et al v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
as 4:2022cv01170
Plaintiff:
Abraham Lizama and Marc Doten
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
