Cases 1 - 8 of 8
IN RE: FCC 11-161
as 11-9900
Petitioner:
DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS CEDAR VALLEY, LLC, a Utah limited liablility company, TOTAH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an Oklahoma corporation, H & B COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Kansas Corporation and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Direct Comm. Cedar Valley, et al v. FCC
as 11-9581
Petitioner:
DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS CEDAR VALLEY, LLC, a Utah limited liablility company, TOTAH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an Oklahoma corporation, H & B COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Kansas Corporation and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Neal v. Hauf et al
as 5:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
Chadwick J Neal
Defendant:
H B Hauf, Lambert Construction Co, Payne County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson, et al v. Romer, et al
as 1:1992cv01470
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bradley , Willie Guyton , Woody Harrison and others
Defendant:
Roy Romer , Aristedes Zavaras , Lou Hesse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burghart v. Corrections Corporation of Ame, et al
as 08-6083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY BURGHART
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, AKA CCA, CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHARLES RAY, Warden and others
Burghart v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2008cv00062
Plaintiff:
Bobby Burghart
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Cimarron Correctional Facility, Charles Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bard et al
as 5:2007cv00422
Plaintiff:
David Bard, David Bard, A B and others
Defendant:
John Whetsel, Oklahoma County, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Anderson et al
as 5:2005cv01060
Defendant:
Charles Ross Anderson, Susan Breinholt Anderson, Loralee Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Debra A Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
