Cases 1 - 10 of 10
B. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05949
Plaintiff:
H. B.
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Raiser, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Uber Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
as 3:2023md03084
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe LSA 340, Katherine Hylin, E. R. and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser, LLC, Raiser-CA, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Bret Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
B. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03488
Plaintiff:
H. B.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Bachmann et al v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area et al
as 4:2022cv06250
Plaintiff:
Philippe Bachmann, Megan Bachmann, Jack Bachmann and others
Defendant:
Golden Gate National Recreational Area, Deb Haaland, Frank Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Shun Trayon Hill v. H. B. Anglea
as 4:2020cv00075
Petitioner:
Shun Trayon Hill
Respondent:
H. B. Anglea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodhouse v. Anglea
as 4:2019cv04546
Petitioner:
Keith E. Woodhouse
Defendant:
H. B. Anglea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv04192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Woodhouse v. Anglea
as 3:2018cv01874
Petitioner:
Keith E. Woodhouse
Respondent:
H. B. Anglea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc. v. Posh Hair Salon Incorporated
as 3:2011cv04142
Plaintiff:
H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc.
Defendant:
Posh Hair Salon Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
