Cases 11 - 20 of 75
YARBOROUGH v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00273
Defendant:
J. BEIGHLEY, ASSOCIATE WARDEN T.K. COZZA-RHODES, R.N. MS. DANIEL and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE YARBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YARBOROUGH v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00267
Defendant:
MS. J. BEIGHLEY, T.K. COZZA-RHODES, MS. DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE YARBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2010cv01127
Plaintiff:
STACY L. BUTLER
Defendant:
C.O. M. DIEODORFF, FEDERAL B.O.P., L.T. HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAUL v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00180
Defendant:
CHURCH, JOHN DOE(S), JOHN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TILLISY v. MARBERRY
as 2:2010cv00150
Respondent:
WARDEN H. J. MARBERRY
Petitioner:
MUHAMMED ZBEIDA TILLISY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOONE v. MARBERRY
as 2:2010cv00145
Petitioner:
GARY DEAN BOONE
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CAMPANA v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00123
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAMPANA
Defendant:
STEPHEN DAVIS, J. DHALIWAL, FIVE UNKNOWN FBOP EMPLOYEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILLA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2010cv00101
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, H. J. MARBERRY and others
DHO:
K. NITES
Petitioner:
EUGENIO VILLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COE v. MARBERRY
as 2:2009cv00336
Petitioner:
ANTRAUN T. COE
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MITCHELL v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2009cv00322
Petitioner:
RONALD MITCHELL
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
