Cases 1 - 10 of 130
USA v. Adam Smith
as 24-10044
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM H. SMITH
Smith v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00745
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Blair Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Terry H Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Blair Logistics LLC and Blair Leasing and Finance LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv03035
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andre Carstarphen, Sr. v. Kennth Gillespie, et al
as 23-13037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE MAURICE CARSTARPHEN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNTH GILLESPIE, MATHEW SIMPSON, ROBERT H. SMITH and others
Smith v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv18972
Plaintiff:
Norman H Smith
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. and Chattem, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Neil Walker v. Michael Crespi, et al
as 22-13872
Petitioner / Appellant:
NEIL WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CRESPI, FRANCES H. SMITH, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Carstarphen v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen and Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Sr.
Defendant:
Kennth Gillespie, Mathew Simpson, Robert H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver et al v. Michaud et al
as 2:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oliver and Norma Oliver
Defendant:
Joseph L. Michaud, Matthew H. Michaud, Douglas H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
