Cases 1 - 10 of 38
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. BRENTWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 5:2020cv03835
Defendant:
RYCON CONSTRUCTION, INC., H.L. WIKER, INC., BRENTWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. BRENTWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03835
Defendant:
RYCON CONSTRUCTION, INC., H.L. WIKER, INC., BRENTWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TANGER PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Gaynor v. Hufford
as 1:2013cv00036
Petitioner:
Kindu Gaynor
Respondent:
H.L. Hufford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cobbin v. Hufford
as 3:2012cv02354
Petitioner:
Alonzo Darnell Cobbin
Respondent:
H.L. Hufford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yaromich v. Hufford et al
as 1:2012cv02134
Petitioner:
Alexander Yaromich
Respondent:
H.L. Hufford and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2012cv01369
Petitioner:
Jerome Anderson
Respondent:
United States Of America , Bureau of Prisons , U.S. Attorney General Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dhinsa v. Hufford
as 3:2012cv00912
Petitioner:
Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa
Respondent:
H.L. Hufford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ford v. The Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2012cv00873
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Ford, Jr.
Defendant:
The Bureau of Prisons, H.L. Hufford, Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Hufford
as 1:2012cv00800
Petitioner:
Antonio Brown
Respondent:
H.L. Hufford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
