Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Hamilton #308527 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00428
Petitioner:
Alpheus Hamilton
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. USA
as 2:2023cv00713
Petitioner:
Anthony Wayne Hamilton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Yost #342976 v. Villegas et al
as 2:2022cv02109
Plaintiff:
Clayton Zachary Yost
Defendant:
Jose Villegas, Unknown Repp, Unknown Obrien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDermott v. Young et al
as 2:2022cv02010
Plaintiff:
Brandon Allen McDermott, Jr.
Defendant:
Dana Young, Unknown Rolnick, Unknown D'Amico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Saidhamad et al
as 2:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Jose Ortiz
Defendant:
Hisham Saidhamad, Mike Gonzalez, Roneel Chetty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton #086843 v. Arizona Department of Collections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
as 2:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
Jimi Lee Hamilton
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Securus Technologies and JPay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00408
Defendant:
Christopher Hamilton, David Shinn, Marcos Basurto and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00104
Defendant:
Christopher Hamilton, David Shinn, Marcos Basurto and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fierro #044803 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02462
Defendant:
Stacey Crabtree, D Kruzyka, P Weston and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Abel Fierro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fierro #044803 v. Latto
as 2:2020cv02461
Defendant:
Unknown Latto, P Weston, D Globus and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Abel Fierro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
