Cases 1 - 10 of 246
Bonilla v. Hamilton
as 4:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Hamilton and U.S District Court Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton and Jacquelyn Lovrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Hamilton
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Hamilton
as 4:2023cv05965
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. Calderon et al
as 4:2023cv05653
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Defendant:
Calderon, Romero, Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Chhabria et al
as 4:2023cv04540
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Vince Chhabria, Chief Judge Richard Seeborg, Judge Joseph C. Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ryland v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s) et al
as 1:2023cv01307
Plaintiff:
Corey R Ryland
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s), North Central Regional Director, J.C. Streeval and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.