Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Andres v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05897
Plaintiff:
Bismar Francisco Andres
Defendant:
Pierce County, Severson, C/O Desmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Widland v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05719
Plaintiff:
Brian Douglas Widland, Jr
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starkgraf v. White et al
as 3:2023cv05593
Plaintiff:
Kristopher S Starkgraf
Defendant:
White, Pierce County Sheriffs Department, Place and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v Strange et al
as 3:2023cv05008
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jay Perez
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Karie Rainer, Traci Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinclair v. Clark County
as 3:2021cv05633
Plaintiff:
Alexander Roy Sinclair
Defendant:
Clark County, Richard Bishop, Joe Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Hamilton
as 2:2019cv01156
Defendant:
Charles Hamilton, III
Plaintiff:
Jason Mark Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2019cv05121
Defendant:
DOC Employees, Scott Light, Fenn and others
Plaintiff:
Micheal Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Federated Insurance Company et al
as 3:2019cv05062
Defendant:
Mary Martin, Aaron Beckman, Office of Insurance Commissioner and others
Plaintiff:
David Arnold Cook and David A Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pendleton v. Spokane City of et al
as 2:2018cv00267
Defendant:
Ernest Wuthrich, Spokane City Prosecutors Office, Terri Pfister and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie C Pendleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Sinclair et al
as 3:2015cv05225
Plaintiff:
Jimi James Hamilton
Defendant:
Steven Sinclair , Fallon Hughes , Tim Birley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
