Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Abeome Corporation Inc. v. J. Stevens, et al
as 24-10094
Plaintiff: ABEOME CORPORATION INC.
Defendant: J. HAMPTON STEVENS, LISA L. TORBETT and GEORGE CAMPBELL
USA v. Dante Hampton
as 23-13140
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANTE SHEROD HAMPTON
Timothy Hampton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-12375
Petitioner / Appellant: TIMOTHY HAMPTON
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Deandre Arnold v. City of Hampton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-11965
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF HAMPTON, WAYNE JERNIGAN, OTANYA CLARKE and others
Randy Butler, Jr. v. Veronica Hampton
as 23-11947
Plaintiff / Appellant: RANDY BUTLER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: VERONICA HAMPTON
Jennifer Cook, et al v. Integrated Behavioral Health, Inc., et al
as 23-11321
Plaintiff / Appellant: JENNIFER COOK and SALLY GAITHER
Defendant / Appellee: INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., SANJAY MALHOTRA, UNITY PSYCHIATRIC CARE and others
Malcolm Washington v. George Barnhill, et al
as 22-10642
Plaintiff / Appellant: MALCOLM ZABAD WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee: GEORGE BARNHILL, (State Bar No. 039275) State of Georgia/City of Waycross, individual and official capacities, RANDY F. ROYAL, State of Georgia/Ware County, individual and official capacities, CARL JAMES and others
Maya Hampton v. John Hamm, et al
as 22-10506
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAYA HAMPTON
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN Q. HAMM, DEBORAH CROOK and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Willie HamptonIn re: Willie Hampton
as 21-13926
Petitioner: In re: WILLIE B. HAMPTON
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
USA v. Earl Hampton
as 21-10357
Defendant / Appellant: EARL EUGENE HAMPTON
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?