Cases 1 - 10 of 174
Hampton v. Yes-Care
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Sashim M. Hampton
Defendant:
Yes-Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chestnut v. Anderson et al
as 3:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Genard Denez Chestnut
Defendant:
Tony Anderson, David Snow, Michael Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. State of Florida
as 6:2023cv02198
Plaintiff:
Dante Sherod Hampton, Jr
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. State of Florida
as 6:2023cv02123
Plaintiff:
Dante Sherod Hampton, Jr
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton Jr v State of Florida et al
as 6:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
Dante Sherod Hampton, Jr
Defendant:
State of Florida, Brevard County State Attorneys Office, Brevard County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Durborrow et al
as 3:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
S. Durborrow, B. Reed, Sergeant Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Hampton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-12375
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY HAMPTON
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Santiago v. Waldron et al
as 3:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
Benito A. Santiago
Defendant:
Waldron, Reed, McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Carter et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Clatys Jenkins, Laveta Boben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv00521
Petitioner:
Chris Hampton
Respondent:
Gwendolyn Davis and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
