Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Hardy v. Hunt Management Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Calvin Hardy
Defendant:
Hunt Management Incorporated and Rivers Edge Homes Association Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hardy v. Radtke
as 2:2022cv00571
Petitioner:
Antwuan M Hardy
Respondent:
Dylan Radtke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardy v. Radtke
as 2:2021cv01320
Petitioner:
Antwuan M Hardy
Respondent:
Warden Dylan Radtke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner, James v. City and County of Racine Clerks Office et al
as 3:2021cv00127
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Samual A. Christensen, Laurie Hardy and others
Plaintiff:
James Robert Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy, John v. Olstad, Ty
as 3:2020cv00754
Defendant:
Ty Olstad
Plaintiff:
John Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milwaukee Electric Tool Company et al v. Shook Hardy & Bacon et al
as 2:2017mc00049
Plaintiff:
Milwaukee Electric Tool Company , Metco Battery Technologies LLC , AC (Macao Commercial Offshore) Limited and others
Defendant:
Shook Hardy & Bacon and McDermott, Will & Emery, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Bowen v. Dallet et al
as 2:2016cv01677
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bowen
Defendant:
Rebecca F Dallet, Scott Walker, Wisconsin Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bowen
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , New Lisbon Correctional Institution, Columbia Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swinson v. Haines
as 1:2014cv01297
Petitioner:
Jesse Hardy Swinson, III
Respondent:
Tim Haines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams et al v. Walgreen Co
as 2:2014cv01208
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Plaintiff:
Lori Adams , Michael Adams , Jaimie Budzinski and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
