Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BREWER v. LAPPIN
as 1:2012cv03250
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brewer
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Perdue et al
as 9:2011cv01139
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Russell A. Perdue, Deborah G. Schult, David Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dragonetti v. Terrell et al
as 1:2011cv02007
Petitioner:
Vincent Dragonetti
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barone v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00654
Plaintiff:
Joseph Steven Barone
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Eric Holder and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Simmons v. Nally, et al
as 9:2003cv01093
Plaintiff:
Alan E. Simmons
Defendant:
Michael K. Nally , Darryl D. Drew , Kathleen Hawk-Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DeFeo v. Lappin
as 1:2008cv07513
Petitioner:
Frank John DeFeo
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McCarroll v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 9:2008cv00522
Plaintiff:
Douglas R. McCarroll
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Deborah Schult and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCarroll v. Lappin et al
as 9:2008cv00324
Petitioner:
Douglas R. McCarroll
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and Debora G. Schult
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bretan et al v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv02982
Petitioner:
Russell E. Bretan and Alexander E. Eisemann
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and John Doe
Defendant:
James Sullivan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ortiz-Alvear v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv00268
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Ortiz-Alvear
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
