Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Paul Azzara v. William Scism
as 12-2307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL AZZARA
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM SCISM, DAVID EBBERT, KEVIN BITTENBENDER and others
Azzara v. Stroda et al
as 3:2011cv01737
Plaintiff:
Paul Azzara
Defendant:
Frank Stroda, R Martinez, Julie Ann Nicklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Azzara v. Scism et al
as 4:2011cv01075
Plaintiff:
Paul Azzara
Defendant:
Wiliam A Scism, David J Ebbert, Kevin Bittenbender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Welch v. McKinnen et al
as 1:2010cv03709
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alfredo Welch
Defendant:
McKinnen, T. SIMMS, A. BOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold Reeves v. Harley Lapin, et al
as 10-1100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD REEVES
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPIN, Director of B.O.P., D. SCOTT DODRILL, Northeast Regional Director, J. GRONDOLSKY, Warden and others
In re: Arnold Reeve
as 09-3408
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ARNOLD REEVES
Defendant - Respondent:
HARLEY LAPIN, Director of B.O.P., D. SCOTT DODRILL, Northeast Regional Director, J. GRONDOLSKY and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT B KUGLER
REEVES v. LAPIN et al
as 1:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD REEVES
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPIN, SCOTT DODRILL, GRONDOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAZZOLI v. US PAROLE COM'N et al
as 1:2008cv03873
Petitioner:
KEVIN RAZZOLI
Respondent:
US PAROLE COM'N, HARLEY LAPIN, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
