Cases 31 - 40 of 138
Trenton Ore v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6092
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRENTON JOSEPH ORE
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
John Tomikel v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7513
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN RUSSELL TOMIKEL
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Elevation Clark v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7507
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELEVATION A. CLARK, a/k/a James I. Thomas
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7451
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Timothy Hatter v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7428
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. HATTER
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Marius Stafford v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6877
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIUS H. STAFFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Chaz Earp v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6659
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHAZ ANTONIO EARP
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Edward Egan v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6580
Defendant:
ROANOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STEVEN A. MCGRAW, Clerk
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Derek Rives v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6512
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEREK RIVES
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Eugene Morley v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6386
Petitioner / Appellant:
EUGENE ELLIOTT MORLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.