Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Harper v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02667
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harper
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. Almaguer et al
as 5:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Jina Edwards
Defendant:
Andrea Almaguer, Andy Lewis, Ia Chanae Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04003
Plaintiff:
Johnny Harper
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harper Holdings, LLC v. Christianson
as 2:2022cv03031
Plaintiff:
Harper Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Dr. David C. Christianson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Christianson v. Harper Holdings, LLC
as 2:2022cv02991
Plaintiff:
Dr. David C. Christianson
Defendant:
Harper Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Harper et al
as 1:2022cv00365
Defendant:
Felita Harper, Reminisce Sports Cafe LLC and Reminisce Sports Cafe
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Kenney et al v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Maurice Kenney, Quinn Moore, Mary Zeiser and others
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Mayor John Cranley, City Manager Patrick Duhaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02156
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Harper
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harper-Thorton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01679
Plaintiff:
Josephine Harper-Thorton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
