Cases 21 - 30 of 31
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY v. SHAH et al
as 2:2013cv01052
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
KISHORI SHAH, M.D., GARDEN STATE ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and HARSHAD PATEL
Pecial_master:
DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. PRIVISAM, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv03842
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
PRIVISAM, LLC, HARSHAD PATEL, JAYESH R. PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. KARISHMA CHANDI PARTNERSHIP et al
as 2:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
KARISHMA CHANDNI PARTNERSHIP, HARSHAD PATEL, ASHISH PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patel et al v. Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC
as 1:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Babu Patel , Harshad Patel and Pravin Patel
Defendant:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crotona 1967 Corp. v. Vidu Brothers Corp. et al
as 1:2010cv06004
Plaintiff:
Crotona 1967 Corp.
Defendant:
Harshad Patel and Vidu Brothers Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Crotona 1967 Corp. v. Vidu Brothers Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv10627
Plaintiff:
Crotona 1967 Corp.
Defendant:
Vidu Brothers Corp. and Harshad Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Patel v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv07680
Plaintiff:
Harshad Patel
Defendant:
Michael Astrue and Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Patel v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv05620
Plaintiff:
Harshad Patel
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
