Cases 1 - 10 of 65
CLARK v. PLATT et al
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
GREGORY T. CLARK, II
Defendant:
CHAD PLATT, KEITH HARTZELL, PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORGEY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HERBERT FORGEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIDDLETON v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON
Defendant:
EMERSON, AUSTIN, HARTZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. STIEN et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
NARVEL WHITFIELD
Defendant:
STIEN, HARTZEL, ABNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. IDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
LEMONTE E. PAYNE
Defendant:
IDOC, PRATT and HARTZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMSEY v. HARTZEL et al
as 1:2023cv01782
Plaintiff:
FAIRLIS G. RAMSEY
Defendant:
KEITH HARTZEL, CHRIS PLATT and SERVIZZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGLAS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv01745
Plaintiff:
MONWELL DOUGLAS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T. PRETORIUS, CHAD PLATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. PRETORIOUS et al
as 1:2023cv01621
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ
Defendant:
PATRICIA PRETORIOUS, CHAD PLATT and KEITH HARTZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. SECREST et al
as 1:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
MILES ANTHONY THOMAS
Defendant:
ALYSSA SECREST, ANTHONY GIBSON, MR. HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Secrest et al
as 3:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Miles Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
Alyssa Secrest, Anthony Gibson, Hartzell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
