Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Imai et al v. Diamond Resorts Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv02000
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Diamond Resorts Corporation, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mari Imai and Minoru Imai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kriege et al v. HCCC Hawaii Community Correctional Center et al
as 3:2019cv01343
Defendant:
HCCC Hawaii Community Correctional Center, R. Woolsey Matsu, Choy and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip B. Kriege, Christopher H. Rooney, All others similarly situated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Lampland v. Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00765
Defendant:
Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Does 1 Through 10
Plaintiff:
Martha Lampland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Inigo v. Express Movers, Inc.
as 3:2018cv02844
Defendant:
Express Movers, Inc. and Express Movers, Inc. a Hawaii Corporation doing business as Express Movers, LLC doing business as Movers Hawaii
Plaintiff:
Fernando Inigo
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc v. Da Kine Hawaii, Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00889
Plaintiff:
Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc
Defendant:
Da Kine Hawaii, Inc and Billabong International, LTD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Verducci et al v. Coda et al
as 3:2010cv00782
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Verducci and Dana M. Verducci
Defendant:
Edward Coda, Hawaii Financial Specialists, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. v. Da Kine Hawaii, Inc et al
as 3:2009cv02272
Plaintiff:
Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc.
Defendant:
Da Kine Hawaii, Inc and Billabong International, LTD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
O'Hines et al v. San Diego et al
as 3:2007cv00853
Plaintiff:
James Lynn O'Hines, Kimberly Lee Lee, Robert Dougherty and others
Defendant:
San Diego, Shilo Masons, Florida St. University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
