Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 59
de Moor et al v. Anthem Blue Cross et al
as 4:2023cv00968
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc., Hawaii Medical Services Corporation doing business as Hawaii Medical Services Association also known as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Hawaii, Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. formerly known as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nevada and others
Plaintiff: MD Carrie de Moor and Code 3 Emergency Physicians, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Houser v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv01592
Defendant: Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company, Arrowood Indemnity Company and others
Plaintiff: Hon. Barbara J. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Curcio v. CCS Medical Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01579
Plaintiff: Frederick D Curcio, IV, United States of America, State of California and others
Defendant: CCS Medical Inc, DEGC Enterprises (US) Inc, Highland Capital Management LP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Well Cell Global LLC v. Calvit et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv03062
Plaintiff: Well Cell Global LLC and Well Cell Support LLC
Defendant: Shawn Paul Calvit, Marc Pierre Desgraves, IV, Charles Alexander Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff: Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant: Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
VanDerStok et al v. Garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G Andren, Tactical Machining LLC and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Petitioner: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms
Amicus Curiae: Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Ryan Busse and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff: State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Amicus Curiae: New York State, California State of, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. State of Texas Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant: Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley, Mistie Sharp and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner: Felipe Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Hawaii Spa, Inc. v. The Hanover Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00253
Plaintiff: Hawaii Spa, Inc.
Defendant: The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Latin v. District of Hawaii
as 4:2021cv01599
Petitioner: Sherease Antionette Latin
Respondent: District of Hawaii and Warden, FPC Bryan Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?