Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Erlenbach v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv08229
Plaintiff:
Chuck C Erlenbach and Treebrook
Defendant:
Travis Blankenship, Blake Lanove, Unknown Hearl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv04360
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Traci Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv00999
Plaintiff:
Loren Williamson, II
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Kevin Curran, John Mattos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv03647
Plaintiff:
Doneevon Tramel Hawkins
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Andrew Kunasek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins #258870 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2016cv00207
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Hawkins
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins #258870 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01701
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Hawkins
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Ron Credio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clyde # 233841 v. McClellen et al
as 2:2013cv01742
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Clyde
Defendant:
Unknown McClellen, Unknown Hanson, E Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dulworth v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2013cv01637
Plaintiff:
Roger D Dulworth
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Jacob Goodman, Thomas C Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Winn
as 4:2013cv00049
Petitioner:
Darryl L Hawkins
Respondent:
Louis W Winn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hawkins #222442 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01505
Petitioner:
Christopher Edward Hawkins
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
