Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Hawkins #307859 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01299
Petitioner:
Arnold Terrell Hawkins
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv00711
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Loraanne M Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Greenville, County of et al
as 2:2021cv00659
Defendant:
Claude Todd, Greer, City of, Greenville, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher S Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Rardin
as 4:2020cv00394
Petitioner:
Frank Goldsborough Hawkins
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chavez et al v. Creative Impact Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv01652
Plaintiff:
Alexia Chavez, Kinnlyn Noice, Graciela Garcia and others
Defendant:
Mark Cumming, Unknown Parties, James Zanzucchi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Erlenbach v. Unknown Party et al
as 3:2019cv08271
Plaintiff:
Chuck C Erlenbach and Treebrook
Defendant:
Travis Blankenship, Unknown Hawkins, Unknown Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erlenbach v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv08229
Plaintiff:
Chuck C Erlenbach and Treebrook
Defendant:
Travis Blankenship, Blake Lanove, Unknown Hearl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv04360
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Traci Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stross v. Hawkins et al
as 2:2019cv03112
Defendant:
Hawkins & Associates Reality Incorporated, Nancy Hawkins and Hawkins & Associates Realty Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Hawkins v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01044
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
