Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Heredia et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv05857
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Heredia , Audrey Davis , Maria Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lutfi v. Stock et al
as 5:2015cv02064
Plaintiff:
Salih Wasim Lutfi
Defendant:
E. Stock, Hawkins, R. Maza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv01213
Plaintiff:
Anita Rose Hawkins and William D. Hawkins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins-Smith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00377
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hawkins-Smith and Arthur Smith
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31036
Plaintiff:
Crystal Hawkins and Gregory Hawkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30954
Plaintiff:
Mary Hawkins and Darrell Maze
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28909
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Hawkins and Travis Hawkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28905
Plaintiff:
Lila Hawkins and Robert Hawkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2014cv26990
Plaintiff:
Kandace Hawkins and Leonard Hawkins
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26491
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hawkins and James Hawkins
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
