Cases 11 - 20 of 1,239
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cordney Hayes v. Edwin Sabillon, et al
as 24-10905
Plaintiff:
CORDNEY MALLORY HAYES
Defendant:
EDWIN SABILLON, Sergeant, Monroe County Detention Center and SAMUEL CARPENTAR, Deputy, Monroe County Detention Center
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Linares
as 4:2024cv10027
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Joseph Linares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Eric Lashawn Hayes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hayes v. Lloyd
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Andre Dwayne Hayes
Defendant:
Khel Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Sabillon et al
as 4:2024cv10024
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Edwin Sabillon and Samuel Carpentar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Topgolf USA Birmingham LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Brooke Hayes
Defendant:
TopGolf USA Birmingham LLC and Top Golf USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Sabillon et al
as 4:2024cv10019
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Edwin Sabillon and Samuel Carpentar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelnutt v. McLaughlin et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Keneth Kaylon Shelnutt
Defendant:
Josh McLaughlin, Brady Aderholt, Gray West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Carpentar et al
as 4:2024cv10014
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
S. Carpentar and J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
