Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Hayes v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Hayward Hayes
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baucom, Jr v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Terry Baucom, Jr
Defendant:
Core Civic, f/n/u Mitchell, f/n/u Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips, Jeff Hayes, Brett Cobble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipkin v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County Sheriff Department, Sgt. Mathew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Oakes et al
as 3:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Melvin Chism, III
Defendant:
Ricky Oakes, Jeff Coffey, Shelly Mannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Dickson County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
Randall Seth Robinson
Defendant:
Dickson County Jail, Tim Eads, (f/n/u) Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Cambell et al
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anthony Walton
Defendant:
Officer Madison Cambell, Officer M. Stewart, Officer f/n/u Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Shelby County Sheriff et al
as 2:2021cv02353
Defendant:
Wellpath, Shelby County Sheriff and CCS
Plaintiff:
Julius Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Dowling et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Shawn Dannels, Daron Hall, Jack E. Dowling and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Gurien et al
as 1:2020cv01285
Defendant:
Corizon Health and Tommy Gurien
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hayes Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
