Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Innamorato et al v. QCP, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corp, DAVID FABRICATORS OF NEW YORK, INC., QCP, INC F/K/A BAKERS PRIDE OVEN COMPANY, INC and others
Plaintiff:
Joann Innamorato and Joseph Innamorato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breakell v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00583
Defendant:
Continental Automotive Systems Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., Maremont Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Adam M. Breakell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Dlugoleski v. Malloy et al
as 3:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, S.O.R. Unit, Jamal Gratlin and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Dlugoleski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey, LLP v. Hassett
as 3:2015cv01289
Plaintiff:
Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey, LLP
Defendant:
John J. Hassett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hennessey v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kathleen M. Hennessey
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, CBS Corporation , Foster Wheeler L.L.C. and others
Cross_claimant:
CBS Corporation and Viad Corp
Cross_defendant:
CBS Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Foster Wheeler L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Magner et al v. Danbury et al
as 3:2010cv01819
Plaintiff:
William E. Magner, JR. , Magner Mgmt LLC and Union Memorial Mgmt LLC
Defendant:
City Of Danbury, Thomas Michael, Mitchell Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tustin v. Jayaraj et al
as 3:2008cv01034
Plaintiff:
Beverly Tustin
Defendant:
Hamsa Jayaraj, Elora Drapeau, Milton Brown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Frulla v. CRA Holdings Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00119
Plaintiff:
Robert Frulla and Robert Frulla
Defendant:
CRA Holdings Inc, Kenneth S. Greenberg, Mari Aldin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
