Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hillier v. Zillow Group Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Aaron Winston Hillier and Sjunde AP-Fonden
Defendant:
Zillow Group, Inc., Richard N Barton, Lloyd D Frink and others
Petitioner:
Slav Danev
William Saunders, Jr. v. Art Council of Princeton, et al
as 21-1118
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY SATTERFIELD, as individual, PUBLIC ART SELECTION COMMITTEE OF PRINCETON, MARION DAVIA, sued as individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HARDY SAUNDERS, JR., artist and photographer, member of class represent minority group; as individual; and on behalf class all other persons similarly situated John and Mary Does one through hundred yet to be identified and determine part of
Armstrong et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAE/2:21-CV-00018
Plaintiff:
Armstrong, Lori A. Armstrong and Paige Rojon Armstrong
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Tom Hillier Ford
Jamel Robinson v. Hanna Saad, et al
as 20-1873
Defendant / Appellee:
PAIGE E. HILLIER, RN, JILL LAWRENCE, Psychologist, ALEKSANDRA WILANOWSKI, Psychiatrist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL LEON ROBINSON
Wynship Hillier v. CIA, et al
as 19-5339
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of State, Central Intelligence Agency and United States Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wynship W. Hillier
Hillier et al v. Ford Motor Company
as CAE/2:18-CV-01294
Plaintiff:
Hillier, John Hillier and Estelle Melody Hillier
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
WERFEL CHIROPRACTIC, PC CHIROPRACTIC, PC et al v. NUTRIMOST, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00879
Plaintiff:
HOWARD WERFEL and WERFEL CHIROPRACTIC, PC
Defendant:
NUTRIMOST LLC , NUTRIMOST DOCTORS, LLC , RAYMOND WISNIEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
HILLIER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2016cv01836
Plaintiff:
WYNSHIP W. HILLIER
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
